G36 is good. It's a full auto 5.56, one supply cost less than the M4. M16 doesn't have full auto, so it's worse in CQB compared to the G36. I've died a few times in CQB with the M16 because the first burst didn't kill, but I would of stood a better chance with the full auto G36.
G36 just isn't popular because it's already in-between two great 5.56 alternatives, and with it being only ONE supply cost to either side, it's not costly to spend one more point for the M4 or sneak in another smoke or attachment if you save that one point picking the M16.
However, I find the two round burst feature on the G36 to be trash in the current state of the game, although niche. Full auto crouch is still the way to go, and the G36 can deliver that with flying colours.
The struggle is real haha. I used to live in an unsealed room sorta outside so I'd have to wear gloves or takes breaks when I played games haha.
I like the Uzi too, but it feels sub par compared to pretty much anything else you can take. Its drum mag is nice on coop, but other than that it performs like crap unless you exclusively use semi auto.
@tooth-decay All rifles regardless of calibers except g3 and fal are 2 shot kill, in advisor category, L85, MK18 are all 2 shots kill, MK17 as a.308 rifle sucks so bad, and the recoil isn't that low compares to G3.
G3 and the FAL only one-shot with a Long Barrel at close range.
That being said, a G3 with a Long Barrel costs the same as a SCAR-H and is like, ten times better.
What do you think? I think it belongs to G36.No reason to use it when M16 and M4 outperform it from every aspect. Also MK17 is pretty bad too, performs like a 5.56 rifle with low magazine capacity and slower rof and high recoil.
G36k at least kills people.
The M24, on the other hand...