Adjust number of players & kick afk

I feel it works better to have 4 - 5 players in a game. It would be more intense and each player would feel valued. Currently, we have too many players and some don't even have to shoot one bullet.

Also, we need to be able to kick afk players. It's annoying when there is only one player alive and the player is afk.

thats what 5p ranked is for, 32p casual is just casual for the sake of fun. and yes it needs vote system to kick players, correct me if I'm wrong its coming i the 8th nov update?

I would love to try out 48p or 64p matches.

@jensiii said in Adjust number of players & kick afk:

I would love to try out 48p or 64p matches.

why would you do that?
32p is already a mess

Because the maps are bigger.

How exactly is 32p a mess?

@jensiii said in Adjust number of players & kick afk:

Because the maps are bigger.

How exactly is 32p a mess?

I don't feel like it's very tactical.
I made a thread about that and a lot of people felt the same way:
https://forums.focus-home.com/topic/31360/gameplay-in-versus-feels-kind-of-senseless

last edited by Benny

@benny yes I've read that. I don't feel the same and neither did some other people. So some do and some don't.

What do you mean by "tactical"? There's no teamwork? I guess that depends a lot on who the players are regardless of the number of players.

@jensiii First of all, it's a mathematical phenomenon: 1 player out of 16 is less valuable than 1 out of 5 (let's say).
By tactical i mean, playing in a coordinated team. It's almost impossible, that 16 players coordinate each other in a good way. At 5 players it's very doable.
Right now, at 16 players per team your success depends a lot on luck: Wheather some guys of the other team cover one particular angle or your teammates move altogether in a clever way.
It's pretty much impossible to make a decision, based on all informations you gather, because there is so much going on (because of 32 players per game) and the lack of communication to every one of your 16 teammates.
Another problem, at least in Push and Skirmish, is, that you don't know how many enemies are alive or when they respawn:
So basically it's possible that you are unlucky and have to play against a full team of 16 players or if you are lucky there are just 2 or 3 players against you in that particular moment.
That's my issue with 32p matches. I'm missing the long term motivation, because it's almost impossible to play it perfect. A lot of times I feel like I've died, but could not have done anything better.
I believe that Firefight will be most effective played in Competitive 5v5.
Push and Skirmish will stay Casual due to the fact of higher player count.
Push could be done 5v5 as well, but it's not in the game right now. That might be an interesting idea.
Skirmish is too big for 5v5.

I agree with what OP wrote, yet only for coop mode.
8 people in coop is just too much. 4-5 would be best.

Looks like your connection to Focus Home Interactive - Official Forums was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.