i am talking no physics, as in static rocks and "hard packed" ground (which i imagine the ground still has some physics to it).

as for non-static (dynamic or physic) objects such as fallen trees or logs. i find these to still be quite normal from what i have noticed and simply move when i drive on them allowing me to keep moving.

now does the camera actually have weight or mass which is giving an affect? i really do not know, but will agree it should not. only, i am not the only one to have noticed this and is something noticed since the original game. this is why i still feel there is something to this, even though by all rights there should not be.

@8up-local Oh, I thought you still had some physics when you had less traction. In that case it sounds like the truck's physics aren't enabled at that moment. I haven't seen that on a selected truck. On non-selected objects, the only effect the camera has from what I've seen is that beyond a certain distance from the camera, objects become static. This so-called physics bubble should be enlarged in my opinion, because as I mentioned sometimes non-selected trucks and logs are static even when they're quite close to my selected truck.

@unster wait i must have misunderstood what you was asking. i did not think you was also including the vehicle, only about if the object i was driving on having physics. now if you are talking vehicles? then yes physics on.

@Unster What I meant was maybe the physics was approximated until the interaction between the tires and the object (rock) was drawn on screen

@ssvqwnp Got you. That would be a really strange way to code the game though. I'd think objects should either move, using full physics, or not move at all, and that's been my impression of the game.