Posts made by Jarple
posted in Insurgency - General Discussion read more

@smoussie I didn't lose any time. I want the security to get the ACOG, I pushed for it before when the game was more alive, but nothing came of it. I've literally stopped playing this game because there is simply no ACOG for Security and the Insurgents have it for some stupid reason.

I'm frustrated because NWI already have these thematic patterns in-game and keep implementing more (Newer MP5 given to Sec, older MP5 given to INS etc) yet there is this massive thematic issue in which Insurgents have the ACOG and Security does not.

@smoussie said in So you give INS older MP5A2, SEC gets newer MP5A5, why not give SEC newer ACOG, INS gets older ACOG?:

the only concern was that Insurgents also have access to the new scopes

Insurgents wouldn't have access to the 'new' acog scopes.

Here is how it would go...

  1. Move current ACOG from Insurgent team to Security team.
  2. Make 'new-3D-asset' ACOG model that is based of an older ACOG model and give that to Insurgents (Insurgents still need a x4 option, but having the newer ACOG version has always tilted me).
posted in Insurgency - General Discussion read more

@smoussie I think you've misunderstood my point.

Q: Why do the insurgents have the M16A2 and not the newer more available M16A4, especially if they could buy it off the internet?
A: For gameplay and thematic sake.

Q: So why would the insurgents get the older MP5A2 and not the MP5A5 that the security team will be getting?
A: For gameplay and thematic sake (It's new content, so both teams get to enjoy using an MP5)

Q: Why would the insurgents get an older ACOG model and not the newer ACOG model the security team should have?
A: Thematic sake.

Q: If the insurgents really had access to the internet, why wouldn't they buy and use M16A4's instead of A2's or AK-12's instead of AKM's?
A: Because the reality of logistics isn't emphasized in this game. The team's gear are more thematically based. Giving the security team the ACOG and giving the Insurgents an older ACOG model is literally following the pre-existing thematic patterns already in the game.

You know what doesn't make any sense? The INS:S damage model. Mic drop

posted in Insurgency - General Discussion read more

This pattern has already been done a few times, with the INS getting older versions of security weapons (M16A4 sec / M16A2 ins) and now the (MP5A5 sec / MP5A2 ins)... So why can't the security team get the newer ACOG scope (which is the current acog model available for insurgent team) and let the Insurgent team have an older more banged up ACOG model?

Please.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

This pattern has already been done a few times, with the INS getting older versions of security weapons (M16A4 sec / M16A2 ins) and now the (MP5A5 sec / MP5A2 ins)... So why can't the security team get the newer ACOG scope (which is the current acog model available for insurgent team) and let the Insurgent team have an older more banged up ACOG model?

Please.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

When you load up the game, at the title screen, it says 'Insurgency Sandstorm Beta'.

Soooo.... ?

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@Boocheus Can't answer my question? Can't provide any constructive pieces of text that are in support of your statement or a counter argument to my statement? Why is that?

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@Boocheus This game company is one of the least 'scummiest' in the recent years when it comes to prioritizing investors over customers... How is NWI 'soulless'? Constant sales on previous titles, they go as cheap as $2, INS:S being a ~$30 game instead of a full priced ~$60, 20% discount on INS:S for owning the previous installment and for pre-ordering, constant game patches and updates, undergoing a 'proper' BETA instead of doing what fallout 76 did which was releasing a 'beta' as a marketing booster.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

Still no ACOG for Security forces in Versus though... feelsbadman.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@Zucchini just chillax bah. Please don't just call out 'sexist' for the sake of it. Stop formulating straw-man arguments in-tangent with generic blanket terms like 'girls' in an attempt to back up your 'sexist' claim. Stop assuming what we are saying. 'Girls' can shoot guns and everyone is okay with them doing such. 'Girls' already shoot guns in the game. 'Girls' already shoot guns in real life, like in the army and female civilians that own firearms. Sure they can add more female models later, but the game is still in beta, so content should be locked. We wouldn't be here if we weren't fine with 'girls' shooting guns because they are already in the game. There are other things more important to work on.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@pacalis said in Pace is too fast.:

Your point "Further weight impacts on acceleration, not max top speed" is very strange for me

I say this because every patch that weight further reduced move speed, acceleration was never reduced along side it. Since move speed has already been reduced a few times, acceleration needs to catch up (get lower).


Top speed-----BETA 1 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]
Accel-------------BETA 1 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]

Top speed-----BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||--------[1]
Accel-------------BETA 2 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]

Top speed-----BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||---------------[1] (later on, after another patch)
Accel-------------BETA 2 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]

This is an example that is somewhat correct. You can see that only speed was changed, acceleration is left untouched.

It should of looked like this...

Top speed-----BETA 1 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]
Accel-------------BETA 1 : [0] |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [1]

Top speed-----BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||--------[1]
Accel-------------BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||--------[1]

Top speed-----BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||---------------[1] (some patch later)
Accel-------------BETA 2 : [0] ||||||||||||||||||||||---------------[1]

Acceleration and top speed are reduced together.


@pacalis said in Pace is too fast.:

both inertia and tagging was present in Ins2, so I would be surprised if they dropped those.

Yeh since the game is still in beta, they should implement these so we can play it out. Strange it wasn't already a thing on beta launch since it was in the first game.

@pacalis said in Pace is too fast.:

So you want to be able to have the heavy guns, the heavy armor, the extra ammo and the same top speed?

No no. I don't want this. Simply put, acceleration needs to be lowered overall and further reduced the more weight you're carrying. Currently, top speed is already being negatively impacted by weight, while acceleration isn't.

EDIT: @cyoce to help understand what I meant by my last point.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@cyoce Right now, weight only affects top speed and I agree that weight should affect acceleration. However, they've already increased the negative impact that weight has on your move speed in a few previous patches. We'll just have to wait and see what changes they make then play it out. I'm hoping they introduce weight impacts acceleration and leave the top speed alone for a while. We don't want to be moving that slowly especially because the maps are quite big.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

It should be detected by the bots if it's not.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

Finally some news! Even though it's an outline, still keen to dive in.

posted in Insurgency - Off-Topic read more

@tuliottr said in Bring @Benz Back:

I'm talking about a banned user that is not even in the discussion anymore, it wasnt aimed at anyone participating in this discussion

HOW IS THAT ANY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT BENZ SAID!?...

@benz said in We want the one hit kills.:

because everyone with 2 braincells can see how flawed your logic is

Actually there is a difference! Benz did't use a highly offensive expletive unlike tuliottr.

Both are directed at people not even in this forum and no one 'participating in this discussion' to put it your way. They are both more of a generalization in order to exaggerate and stretch the descriptive nature of what your talking about.

@jensiii 'Flame-baiting' (which was the ban reason stated) isn't even in the Community Rules. It actually comes under 'Trolling', but Benz wasn't banned for 'Trolling'.

In support of jensiii's statements about a 'clear line' and 'ban objectivity', this is why we follow principals, due process and procedure so all this doesn't need to take place.

posted in Insurgency - Off-Topic read more

@planetcanada said in Bring @Benz Back:

delusional and blind

Sounds similar to how Benz pointed out how someone's logic was flawed and even they don't know it.

@planetcanada said in Bring @Benz Back:

Like talking to brick walls

Further solidifies my point.

I'm offended. The nature of this post is offensive.

posted in Insurgency - Off-Topic read more

@tuliottr said in Bring @Benz Back:

how much of a cunt do you have to be to actually get to this level in a forum discussion about games?

Mods please, ban this user. Legit just used a highly offensive expletive! I'm offended. It was used in the exact same way that Benz got banned.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@DerpyDays Seems like you don't stand by any principals. When you see the principals you stand by being disregarded in the actions of others, you step in. That's what I did with Benz's situation.

posted in Insurgency: Sandstorm Pre-Order Beta - General Feedback read more

@DerpyDays I part-take in this because It's a matter of principal.

Looks like your connection to Focus Home Interactive - Official Forums was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.